Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

GH

GameSquare Holdings, Inc. (GAME)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q2 revenue of $15.85M fell 11% YoY and declined sequentially vs. Q1 ($21.1M), driven by delayed closings and weaker programmatic ads; gross margin improved to 15.3% vs. 14.1% YoY and adjusted EBITDA loss narrowed YoY to $(3.50)M .
  • Results missed Wall Street consensus: revenue $21.66M est vs. $15.85M actual and Primary EPS $(0.15) est vs. $(0.174) actual; coverage remains thin (2 estimates)*.
  • Management cited tariff headlines impacting two large China-based gaming deals and programmatic ad weakness, but pointed to a robust pipeline with expected sequential growth in Q3 and further in Q4 .
  • Post-quarter catalysts: launch of an onchain ETH yield program (8–14% target), $5M buyback funded by ETH yield, $2.5M AOR win with Animecoin/Azuki, and plan to reintroduce full-year guidance in Q3 .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Margin and profitability trajectory improved: gross margin up 120 bps YoY and adjusted EBITDA improved 16% YoY, with additional ~$5M annualized OpEx savings identified for H2 .
    Quote: “We’ve reduced SG&A by 15% and expanded gross margin by 120 bps, driving a 16% improvement in adjusted EBITDA year over year… and identified a further $5,000,000 in annualized savings” .
  • Commercial momentum and product wins: StreamHatchet signed its largest contract (Monster Hunter Wilds), added a managed services agreement with Ubisoft, and launched an AI-based solution for creative/audience targeting .
    Quote: “This engine uses machine learning to decode creative content, audience sentiment and engagement patterns…” .
  • Strategic repositioning and capital deployment: divested remaining FaZe Media stake (simplifies mix), launched Ethereum treasury strategy and authorized $5M buyback funded by onchain yield; treasury assets and liquidity considerably stronger post-quarter .

What Went Wrong

  • Top-line miss vs. estimates and YoY decline: revenue $15.85M vs. $21.66M est, down 11% YoY on programmatic ad softness and delayed closings .
  • Macro frictions: tariff headlines slowed two multiyear, seven-figure China-headquartered gaming contracts expected to close earlier, contributing to Q2 softness .
  • Still loss-making in Q2: adjusted EBITDA loss $(3.50)M and GAAP net loss $(3.02)M despite YoY improvement; sequential revenue declined vs. Q1 .

Financial Results

Q2 2025 vs. Consensus

MetricConsensusActual
Revenue ($USD)$21,658,015*$15,852,706
Primary EPS$(0.15)*$(0.174)*

Notes: Values with asterisk (*) retrieved from S&P Global.

YoY comparison (Q2 2024 → Q2 2025)

MetricQ2 2024Q2 2025
Revenue ($USD)$17,829,175 $15,852,706
Gross Profit ($USD)$2,521,294 $2,426,454
Gross Margin (%)14.1% 15.3%
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD)$(4,165,198) $(3,495,651)
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%)(23.4%) (22.1%)
Net Loss attributable to GAME ($USD)$(11,613,551) $(3,018,346)
GAAP EPS (basic & diluted)$(0.38) $(0.08)

Sequential comparison (Q1 2025 → Q2 2025)

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025
Revenue ($USD)$21,100,000 $15,852,706
Gross Margin (%)15.8% 15.3%
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD)$(3,400,000) $(3,495,651)

KPIs and Balance Sheet Highlights (as of 08/13/2025, post-quarter)

KPIValue
ETH holdings15,630.07 ETH; cost basis ~$55M; market value $74.3M
Unrealized ETH gains~$19.3M
NFT holdingsCryptoPunk #5577 purchased for $5.15M on 07/24/2025
ETH + NFT + Cash$99M ($1.00 per share)
Total debt~$1.25M
Cash & equivalents~$20M

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent (Q2) UpdateChange
Revenue (Pro Forma)FY 2025“At least $100M” (Q1 commentary) Full-year guidance to be reintroduced in Q3; ~60% of 2025 revenue expected in H2 Deferred; directional H2 weighting maintained
Gross MarginFY 2025Target 20–25% Expect further improvement in H2 from mix and seasonality Maintained directionally
Operating ExpensesFY 2025Around $20M Additional ~$5M annualized savings to begin contributing in Q3 Lowered (cost actions)
Capital ReturnsOngoingN/AUp to $5M buyback funded by ETH yield proceeds Introduced
Onchain Yield TargetOngoingN/AETH yield strategy targets 8–14% (launched Aug 1) Introduced

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 2025)Current Period (Q2 2025)Trend
Onchain ETH TreasuryDiscussed balancing profitability goals with new initiatives; focus on H2 EBITDA/FCF inflection Strategy launched; 15,630 ETH; $19.3M unrealized gains; yield 8–14% target; buyback tied to yield Accelerating
AI/Technology initiativesStreamHatchet pivoting to managed services; growing SaaS pipeline StreamHatchet launched AI solution; largest contract win; new managed services with Ubisoft Positive
Macro/TariffsNot highlighted Tariff headlines delayed two large China-based gaming contracts Headwind in Q2
Programmatic AdsHeadwind cited; mix shift underway Continued weakness pressured top line; focus remains on higher-margin areas Ongoing mix shift
Pipeline/SeasonalityH2 ~60% of sales; stronger H2 expected “Pipeline as strong as all year”; expect Q3 > Q2 and Q4 > Q3 Building into H2
Cost ActionsEfficiency drive continuing Additional ~$5M annualized savings identified; H2 contribution Improving

Management Commentary

  • Strategic positioning: “We believe GameSquare is one of only a few companies globally that combines a proven high performing operating business with a large scale actively managed Ethereum treasury” .
  • Operating pipeline and H2 setup: “We expect meaningful sequential growth with Q3 revenue higher than Q2 and Q4 building further on that growth” .
  • On macro headwinds: “Two… large deals with global gaming companies… headquartered in China… slowed down… by the confusion that… tariffs created” .
  • Profitability path: “With approximately $5,000,000 of annualized restructuring costs [savings]… and the… yield off our current Ethereum strategy, you’re already sort of at breakeven” (before revenue growth) .
  • Capital allocation: “Board… approved a share repurchase program… up to $5,000,000… funded directly from the net proceeds of our on chain yield strategy” .

Q&A Highlights

  • Q2 softness drivers and timing: Management cited tariff-related delays on two large China-based gaming deals and programmatic ad weakness; emphasized these deals remain active and pipeline remains robust .
  • Crypto-native revenue ramp: 15+ active discussions; expect contributions in H2 2025, with $2.5M Animecoin/Azuki AOR already signed to hit Q3/Q4 .
  • Restructuring details: Continued platform consolidation (StreamHatchet and Sideqik), integration efficiencies from prior deals, and run-rate savings to support H2 profitability .
  • Guidance cadence: Full-year guidance planned for reintroduction in Q3; management reiterated back-half weighting and improving mix/margins .

Estimates Context

  • Misses vs. consensus: Revenue $21.66M est vs. $15.85M actual; Primary EPS $(0.15) est vs. $(0.174) actual; # of estimates: 2 (both revenue and EPS)*.
  • Consensus implications: Given Q2 timing delays (tariffs, programmatic), estimates likely need to shift revenue and margin contribution into H2 in line with management’s pipeline and seasonal commentary .

Note: Values marked with an asterisk (*) are retrieved from S&P Global.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Q2 miss was largely timing/mix-driven; management points to a strong, seasonally favorable H2 with Q3 and Q4 sequential growth expected .
  • Margin trajectory is improving YoY and should benefit from mix, restructuring savings (~$5M annualized), and a lower programmatic emphasis .
  • The onchain ETH treasury strategy (8–14% yield target) and $5M buyback create incremental, yield-funded capital return and a potential floor to equity value if executed prudently .
  • New Web3 deals (e.g., $2.5M Animecoin/Azuki AOR) validate the cross-over between GameSquare’s operating platform and crypto-native demand; more deals are in active discussions .
  • Watch for Q3: reintroduction of full-year guidance, initial yield results disclosure cadence, and conversion of delayed pipeline into revenue; these are near-term stock catalysts .
  • Risk checks: macro/geopolitical sensitivity (tariffs on China-based publishers), continued programmatic ad weakness, and execution on onchain yield within targeted risk controls .